翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Johnson (1944)
・ United States v. Johnson (1946)
・ United States v. Johnson (1966)
・ United States v. Johnson (1968)
・ United States v. Johnson (1982)
・ United States v. Johnson (1987)
・ United States v. Johnson (2000)
・ United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302 (1943)
・ United States v. Jones (2012)
・ United States v. Jones (disambiguation)
・ United States v. Jordan
・ United States v. Ju Toy
・ United States v. Juvenile Male
・ United States v. Kagama
・ United States v. Kahriger
United States v. Kaiser
・ United States v. Karo
・ United States v. Kebodeaux
・ United States v. Keenan
・ United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
・ United States v. Kil Soo Lee
・ United States v. Kilbride
・ United States v. Kincade
・ United States v. Kirby
・ United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.
・ United States v. Kirschner
・ United States v. Klein
・ United States v. Knotts
・ United States v. Kozminski
・ United States v. Kramer


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Kaiser : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Kaiser

''United States v. Kaiser'', U.S. 299 (1960), was an income tax case before the United States Supreme Court.
== Background ==
Union and non-union strikers were provided limited financial assistance by a union.
When the non-union taxpayer filed his tax form, he did not include the amount of the assistance in his gross income. The taxpayer paid the additional tax owed and after an administrative rejection of his refund claim, sued for the refund in the United States district court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
A jury found that the financial assistance was a gift, excluding it from income under § 102(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, but a judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted to the government. Then a United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a district court's grant of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict against respondent taxpayer.
By a divided vote, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed. 262 F.2d 367. It held alternatively that the assistance was not within the concept of income of § 61 (a) of the Code, and that in any event the jury's determination that the assistance was a gift, and hence excluded from gross income by § 102 (a), had rational support in the evidence and accordingly was within its province as trier of the facts.
We granted the Government's petition for certiorari, because of the importance of the issues presented. 359 U.S. 1010.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Kaiser」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.